Facebook

Kommentarer

1. 
   Istvan
   19:24, 2014-01-02
   1

   Ha ha ha…. UI hade för ovanlighetems skull en tråd med rikliga kommentarer. Så jag kollade om det tillkommit något – och nu är nästan allt raderat. Vilket sorgligt sätt att bekräfta sin ovederhäftiga ensidighet
   Jag tycker det saknas en kanal på nätet för IPCC-sidan som också klarar/vågar att ta debatten och förklaringar utan censur.

2. 
   Istvan
   19:43, 2014-01-02
   2

   Varför ska min Androids webläsare behöva krascha varje gång jag kommenterar – fixa det please!

3. 
   Pär Green
   20:02, 2014-01-02
   3

   “Facebook” är värre än virus!
   Lägg ner!

4. 
   Göran
   20:12, 2014-01-02
   4

   Facebook är virus.
   Varje gång jag startar min androidplatta har jag något från Facebook som tränger på och vill ha uppmärksamhet eller någon totalt för mig okänd person som önskar bli vän?
   Det är Facebook som jag upplever.
   Men det kanske är bra att klimatupplysningen finns även där, det gäller ju att tränga sig på för att få fram sitt budskap.

5. 
   Helge
   20:14, 2014-01-02
   5

   Bra!
   Synd att kommentarerna inte är synkade.

6. 
   Kalle
   22:09, 2014-01-02
   6

   Om man har problem med att browsern i sin läsplatta kraschar kan det hjälpa att rensa all webbdata. Alternativt kan man prova en annan Browser. Har provat ett tiotal när det var som värst, men nu verkar antingen Safari eller Chrome funka på de fåtal sajter som krånglar för iPad. Kör Opera och Chrome på min Android-telefon av samma anledning. Misstänker att de inte upptäcker att cachad info ändrats. Sen förstås, boota om en någon gång i veckan.

7. 
   Kalle
   22:16, 2014-01-02
   7

   Och förstås, se till att döda all appar som körs i bakgrunden en gång om dagen.

8. 
   Pär Green
   20:30, 2014-01-03
   8

   Lämna Facebook! Det är enbart till för att lura unga personer!
   Är Du medlem i Facebook, får Du enbart en reklam om en massa nya ”vänner”!

9. 
   Mikael W.
   21:05, 2014-01-03
   9

   Nu visar det sig att även Hitler fastnat i isen.
   http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=03SWGkxt72A

10. 
    Håkan Bergman
    21:13, 2014-01-03
    10

    Testar min Nexus 7.

11. 
    Håkan Bergman
    21:14, 2014-01-03
    11

    Ingen krasch eller nåt med Chrome på Nexus 7.

12. 
    Pär Green
    15:21, 2014-01-04
    12

    Lena,
    Din intention är bra,
    men absolut inte via Facebook!
    Facebook är virus!

13. 
    Mikael W.
    19:25, 2014-01-05
    13

    ”BBC secret exposed: Greenpeace, activists, BP decide what “science” brits see — Hello TwentyEightGate
    Oh the irony. The BBC, supposedly the public owned broadcaster, had a meeting with 28 climate experts in Jan 2006 where it decided on its policies on climate coverage. It led to the extraordinary move of the BBC abandoning any semblance of impartiality (a principle that’s so important it’s written into its charter). In the meantime, the BBC did everything it could to hide those influential experts names. It’s been nearly seven years since the seminar, but now we know why their names were top secret. No one is even pretending this was about “the science”. The BBC has become a PR wing of Greenpeace.
    In mid 2007 Tony Newbery of Harmless Sky started asking who was at the seminar, but the BBC wouldn’t give up the names. In fact the BBC thought the names were so significant that when Newbery sent them an FOI, they not only refused to hand over the list, but they used six lawyers against him (see The Secret 28 Who Made BBC ‘Green’ Will Not Be Named). The BBC, improbably, argued they weren’t “public” and even more improbably, they won the case. Who knew? The BBC could be considered a “private organisation”. Where are the shareholders?
    Having spent many thousands defending their secret meeting with such elaborate wordsmithing and lawyering, presumably, the irony is sweet that when Maurizio Morabito (omnologos) hunted online, he found the sacred list published in full. (Thanks to the wayback machine.)
    The BBC is a tax funded organization with a charter to be impartial. So which climate experts were allowed to help decide what the British public should see and pay for?
    These ones: Blake Lee-Harwood, and Li Moxuan, Greenpeace; Andy Atkins, Advocacy Director, and Tadesse Dadi, Tearfund (Charity); Trevor Evans, US Embassy; Iain Wright, BP International; Joe Smith, The Open University; Saleemul Huq, IIED (Int. Inst. for Environment Development); Mark Galloway, Director, IBT (International Broadcasting Trust); Tessa Tennant, Chair, AsRia; Andrew Dlugolecki, Insurance industry consultant; Anita Neville, E3G; and more… (see below)
    How many unskeptical climate scientists were there? Three. How many skeptical scientists? Zero.
    Most of the list of “climate experts” advising the BBC were activists, advocacy directors, charities, or were involved in sustainable (green) investments. Big Oil even had a seat at that table. Do they care for polar bears or was it because they were involved in the giant CO2 Capture Research Project? (As it happens, they gave up on those plans in May 2007.) h/t davidmhoffer (WUWT)
    Rog Tallbloke slices it beautifully:
    So now the BBC has yet another big problem on it’s hands. It turns out it has lied to the public who pay for it about the makeup of the group which has determined it’s climate reporting policy. This is no small matter considering the billions of pounds involved in the Green energy industry. Additional carbon taxation has directly led to fuel poverty for hundreds of thousands. The excess cold related deaths in the UK have shot up in the last few years. We hear stories of pensioners buying secondhand books by the yard and burning them to keep warm.
    The BBC sent four low level representatives: Peter Rippon, Steve Mitchell, Helen Boaden, George Enwistle. All have since risen to power.”

14. 
    Olav Gjelten
    16:20, 2014-01-06
    14

    Denk vrij. Denk AEGON.